generic opensim gait 2392 model Search Results


90
OpenSim Ltd gait_2392 model
Gait 2392 Model, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gait_2392 model/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gait_2392 model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd reflective markers gait 2392
Reflective Markers Gait 2392, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/reflective markers gait 2392/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
reflective markers gait 2392 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd standard opensim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis
Standard Opensim Workflow Including Scaling, Inverse Kinematics And Muscle Analysis, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard opensim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard opensim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd 2392 model marker guidelines
2392 Model Marker Guidelines, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2392 model marker guidelines/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2392 model marker guidelines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd gait 2392
Gait 2392, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gait 2392/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gait 2392 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd 2392-osm-ik-angles
Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
2392 Osm Ik Angles, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2392-osm-ik-angles/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2392-osm-ik-angles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd gait model 2392
Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
Gait Model 2392, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gait model 2392/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gait model 2392 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd opensim 2392 model
Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
Opensim 2392 Model, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/opensim 2392 model/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
opensim 2392 model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd scaled generic musculoskeletal model with 23 degrees of freedom (gait 2392)
Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
Scaled Generic Musculoskeletal Model With 23 Degrees Of Freedom (Gait 2392), supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/scaled generic musculoskeletal model with 23 degrees of freedom (gait 2392)/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scaled generic musculoskeletal model with 23 degrees of freedom (gait 2392) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd opensim 4.428,29
Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
Opensim 4.428,29, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/opensim 4.428,29/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
opensim 4.428,29 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd general musculoskeletal multibody 2392 model
Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
General Musculoskeletal Multibody 2392 Model, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/general musculoskeletal multibody 2392 model/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
general musculoskeletal multibody 2392 model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd 2392-opensim model
Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the <t>2392-OSM</t> showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).
2392 Opensim Model, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2392-opensim model/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2392-opensim model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the 2392-OSM showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).

Journal: medRxiv

Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

Figure Lengend Snippet: Joint kinematics (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the three different models for our participants with CP (top three rows) and our TD participants (button three rows). In both participants groups, hip flexion/extension angles from the 2392-OSM showed large differences compared to the other two models (CGM and modif-OSM).

Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

Techniques: Standard Deviation

Normalized muscle length (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the four different modelling frameworks for our participants with CP (top two rows) and our TD participants (button two rows). *** = significant difference between 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles, ||| = significant difference between modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles.

Journal: medRxiv

Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

Figure Lengend Snippet: Normalized muscle length (mean waveforms ± one standard deviation) obtained with the four different modelling frameworks for our participants with CP (top two rows) and our TD participants (button two rows). *** = significant difference between 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles, ||| = significant difference between modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles.

Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

Techniques: Standard Deviation

Root-mean-square-differences (RMSD) and maximum differences (max diff) in normalized muscle-tendon length between the 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles (solid bards) and between the modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles (empty bars). Error bars represent ± one standard deviation. RMSD and maximum differences decreased when using the modif-OSM compared to the 2392-OSM, which was in agreement with our second hypothesis. *** indicates significant differences (P<0.001).

Journal: medRxiv

Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

Figure Lengend Snippet: Root-mean-square-differences (RMSD) and maximum differences (max diff) in normalized muscle-tendon length between the 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles (solid bards) and between the modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles (empty bars). Error bars represent ± one standard deviation. RMSD and maximum differences decreased when using the modif-OSM compared to the 2392-OSM, which was in agreement with our second hypothesis. *** indicates significant differences (P<0.001).

Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

Techniques: Standard Deviation

Comparison of muscle-tendon length from one of our participants with CP with the mean values of our TD participants using all four modelling approaches. Clinical interpretation based on the muscle-tendon length from the modif-OSM-IK-angles, modif-OSM-CGM-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles modelling frameworks would be similar. The 2392-OSM-IK-angles approach showed compared to the other modelling frameworks smaller differences between the CP child and average TD waveforms for all analyzed muscles apart of the adductor longus muscle.

Journal: medRxiv

Article Title: The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model

doi: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253257

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of muscle-tendon length from one of our participants with CP with the mean values of our TD participants using all four modelling approaches. Clinical interpretation based on the muscle-tendon length from the modif-OSM-IK-angles, modif-OSM-CGM-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles modelling frameworks would be similar. The 2392-OSM-IK-angles approach showed compared to the other modelling frameworks smaller differences between the CP child and average TD waveforms for all analyzed muscles apart of the adductor longus muscle.

Article Snippet: Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM.

Techniques: